![xbox 360 s wifi xbox 360 s wifi](https://p.calameoassets.com/120311003227-7c6240a5b90f3a1f153dfc41222719fb/p1.jpg)
Please do NOT direct link to anything that violates copyright laws. FAQ / Wiki and Tutorials Xbox Homebrew DiscordĪnything and everything related to Xbox 360 hacking! Visible distortion of a single wave so far out of bad it would not affect any 2.4GHz devices.News, releases, and questions regarding Xbox 360, Xbox One, and future Xbox homebrew. If individual cycles of the 2.4GHz waveform you saw looked rough then you made a mistake sampling the signal. You will see changes in frequency or phase (I'm not certain which). Wi-Fi is meant to look like noise across 30MHz of spectrum). Especially signals designed to look like noise (n.b. Third: Modulated signals are necessarily not sine waves. For example, psk31 is a digital mode with a bandwidth of about 31Hz.
![xbox 360 s wifi xbox 360 s wifi](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dA_lCVkoKoY/maxresdefault.jpg)
potentially less than analog transmission of the same information). Second: Digital modulation techniques need not "bleed over" significantly past the bandwidth required to carry the information (i.e. Channel 1 overlaps channels 2 through 5 enough to cause interference. In fact, the channels are 30Mhz wide and contain spread spectrum signals. That's about it.įirst: Wi-Fi devices may be assigned "static channels", but these are not minimally wide frequency bands as you imply. You are right about 2.4 GHz devices interfering with each other. It's also entirely possible it's just a spread-spectrum transmitter doing exactly what it's supposed to do in a largely unregulated piece of spectrum.) (Of course, it's entirely possible there's something broken about the XBOX radio. I suppose we should all be thankful that radio engineers are better educated than the average Slashdot poster. Just because the signal represents digital data doesn't mean you have to use square waves or something. There are plenty of digital radio protocols that use a very well defined slice of bandwidth, without any more bleed over than traditional AM or FM radio analog broadcasts. The hell? There is nothing magic about digital data that means you can't bandwidth-limit the outgoing transmission. Without the ability to separate the signals by a large frequency, digital over analog bleeds all over the place. It's bad because 2.4 Ghz is radio, carrying digital info, which due to the nature of the produced sign wave results in a signal distortion more commonly known as "bleed over". or maybe its just the wireless network thats screwing with the headsets and they're looking for a scapegoat. i think something else is screwing with their headsets & wireless network.
![xbox 360 s wifi xbox 360 s wifi](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/fXAAAOSw849eGNUL/s-l600.jpg)
the 360 has been out for way too long for this to not have been noticed. so, all in all, i think this is a load of bull.
#Xbox 360 s wifi Bluetooth#
i have both a ps3 & 360 virtually one on top of the other (a shelf plus a few inches of space in between) and the ps3's bluetooth controllers work just as fine as they did before i got the 360. they said the 360 makes the signal even when its not turned on. now, the only comment i can make on this is that i think they have cheap bluetooth headsets. the only bit that doesn't fit with this is that they said the IT staff had issues using their bluetooth headsets. however, apparently all over the rest of the country, in huge universities with thousands of xbox 360s. A small college is experience problems with their new wireless network equipment in the presence of a few xbox's.